View Single Post
  #18  
Old October 19th 03, 01:23 AM
Tim J
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That is ridiculous. If I follow the approach procedures I will stay away
from the granite. I would recommend reading TERPS. Maybe I am an idiot for
following the procedures as published, but it lets me work on the other
parts of flying and I have more time and effort left for the rest of the
work during an approach.

wrote in message
...


Tim J wrote:



The bottom line is the approach is the approach - I don't think it is
intended as a "suggestion." - why stay above the heights? Wouldn't you
rather get down as fast as possible than be in the clouds? The

altitudes on
the approach chart guarantee more than reasonable obstacle clearance -

not
performing the approach as published would also lead me to wonder if

there
are other things you would make up your own procedures for and as a DE I
would consider that a bad thing...

Another "bottom line" is that the stepdown altitude in a NPA profile is

a
*minimum* altitude.


If you think in terms of getting down to a stepdown to "get out of the

clouds"
that is a good way to find granite or trees instead of water vapor. This

is not
just my view; the industry/government accident stats are replete.