View Single Post
  #4  
Old June 29th 04, 09:02 PM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (WalterM140)
Date: 6/29/2004 5:40 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Today's New York Times:

"The extreme reach of the administration's view that a war president is not
subject to check by the other branches of government was apparent in the
recently disclosed memorandums on torturing prisoners. A Defense Department
memo from March 2003 said that "any effort by Congress to regulate the
interrogation of unlawful combatants would violate the Constitution's sole
vesting of the commander-in-chief authority in the president." The
administration later disavowed that argument. It would plainly fail the
Supreme
Court's test."

These sorry Republican *******s have got to go.

Walt


Walt, please get a dictionary and look up 'usurp' and 'disavow.'

Secondly look beyond the NYT article.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...washpost/20040
629/ts_washpost/a13350_2004jun28

Thirdly please take your rants elswhere.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Ads