On Monday, November 4, 2013 4:59:49 PM UTC-6, Bug Dout wrote:
Good arguments. But I always use this:



The highest economic use of a piece of land is not always the most

desirable use.



Consider city parks. They produce no tax revenue, on the contrary, they

require upkeep so consume taxes. What?? Then let's remove them! Replace

them with condos, homes, businesses, and maybe a gasoline station or

two.

Park trees produce OXYGEN, why does Orval hate oxygen atoms ?