View Single Post
  #28  
Old April 23rd 07, 12:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Daryl Hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 63
Default VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION


"Tankfixer" wrote in message
ink.net...
In article . net,
mumbled
----------
In article . net,

Tankfixer
wrote:

In a follow-up, FAS noted that there are errors in the guide

concerning the
dimensions of US aircraft. Not only was the recognition guide

needlessly
restricted, but that restriction may have prevented it from being

accurate.


Needlessly restricted ?
That's odd as it can be ordered by any unit with a publications

account
with USAPA


It was at least classified FOUO, possibly secret. You can look up the

post
at
www.fas.org and see their Secrecy and Government Bulletin.

It is FOUO.
If it were classified secret FAS would have been closed for publishing
it to the web.

You can't request classified publications from USAPA.
While FAS does at time do a pretty good job they are prone to hype
things.


The original debate was about AC Recognition. Now, you don't know a damned
thing about that so you try to move it away into your area of expertise;
trolling on a non related subject.

The fact is, you would be the first to bag a F-4 mistaking it for a Mig-21
while the AF, Navy, Marine and Army Flyers will be the last to make that
mistake. But those mistakes were made regardless. So you think it's easy?
Don't volunteer for AC Spotter for our side. You will do us better to go
over to the other side and help them.