View Single Post
  #178  
Old June 15th 08, 07:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Raymond O'Hara
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 88
Default GIVEN CURRENT WARS, F-35s ARE BETTER CHOICE THAN MORE F-22As


"tankfixer" wrote in message
...
In article , raymond-
says...

"tankfixer" wrote in message
...
In article , raymond-
says...

are they just going to magically appear in 10 years, full blown, armed
to
the teeth with ultra-fighters?

Yes.

Example: German 1930 to 1940.


the germans didn't have the best stuff. and there was plenty of warning.
the french built the maginot linebefore the german threat was known.
you want to do the same today.
we started then too.
the u.s. built a tank factory and it was producing tanks in less than a
year.


In 1930 Germany was a semi stable democracy that was no danger to her
neighbors.
No one really believe she would be a danger again.
Over the next ten years she build up her airforce and army to the point
that by 1940 she had taken Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, France,
Belgium and the Netherlands.
Back then a fighter or tank could be designed and produced in under a
year.
To suggest that any country can do that now is absurd.


in 1930 everybody was mired in a worldwide depression. england and france
were bankrupt.
the situation is not at all analogous. and germany was a concievable enemy.
and the fact is the allies didn't lack better weapons than the germans.
hurricanes and DW520s were capable and the spitfire maybe better than the
ME109.
british tanks had better armour and french tanks had better armour and
bigger guns.

you are carrying on like we are defenseless and falling behind.

and you also refuse to acknowledge the fact we are embroiled in 2 wars that
are straining the economy and which show no sign of ending anytime soon. .
we just can't keep spending on things that aren't needed now,