View Single Post
  #4  
Old February 21st 06, 11:25 PM posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible

An angry Democrat trying to blame it on Bush it seems. I
have no doubt that an few hours of training would allow any
adult to fly well enough to crash into a building. I took
my son up on a delivery flight for a BE %( Baron that was
going to the FAA in OKC. He was about three years old at
the time. He could not see out over the door sill, let
alone the panel, but there was a full set of co-pilot
instruments and he hand flew straight and level very well
from the right seat.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"WaltBJ" wrote in message
oups.com...
| Another strewer of BS. I have given many rpt many
non-flyers rides in
| T33s, TF102s, F104Bs up to and including the F4 (50,000
pounds) and
| after a little coaching quite a few have done well,
includig passable
| barrel rolls. Herding one of those big transport beasts
around the sky
| is like driving a truck in 3 dimensions. Flying into a
tall building is
| something I estimate (learned guess) at least 3 of any 10
people could
| do without much trouble. Mr. Sagadevan is wrong wrong
wrong. And he
| ignores the telephone calls from the passengers in his
tortuous
| reasoning Just another attention-seeker.
| Walt BJ
|