In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote:

Bob,

I'd rather have someone as President with limited science knowledge


That's not the point. Denying evolution is not a lack of knowledge, it
is an anti-science stance. It is unforgivable in a president (as has
been well demonstrated by the current one, I might add).

Denying the theory of evolution is not necessarily anti-science.

Are people going to demand some kind litmus test for embracing
science of Presidential candidates? Can we apply that to voters
too? ;-)

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)