On Mar 27, 5:45*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
" *It all started looking at 172's. And things sort of grew.
I hear it happens with boats also "

roger on that....... * * *‹(•¿•)›

On Mar 27, 3:36*pm, The Visitor
wrote:



Well it is probably a slower airplane. Thinking about it, it may have
been too slick and not a stable. I can ask around. I myself looked at
210's. It seems to be a very nice machine. I got the seneca at the time
because they were still being built. It all started looking at 172's.
And things sort of grew. I hear it happens with boats also.

John

~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
it l@@ks like "just more airplane" in general....

-----snip------------------------------------

Specifications (206H Stationair)

General characteristics
Crew: one, pilot
Capacity: 5 passengers
Length: 28 ft 3 in (8.62 m)
Wingspan: 35 ft 10 in (10.92 m)
Height: 9 ft 7 in (2.92 m)
Wing area: 174 ft² (16.2 m²)
Empty weight: 2,146 lb (974 kg)
Max takeoff weight: 3,614 lb (1,640 kg)
Powerplant: 1× Lycoming IO-540-AC1A5, 300 bhp (224 kW)

Performance
Maximum speed: 151 kt (285 km/h)
Cruise speed: 142 kt (263 km/h)
Range: 721 nm (1,335 km)
Service ceiling 15,700 ft (4,785 m)
Rate of climb: 988 ft/min (301 m/min)

On Mar 27, 1:53 pm, The Visitor
wrote:

I have seen a few people pass over the 210 for a 206. But I forget why..

~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:

any tips and / or observations to
"watch for" in moving from a 182rg to a t210?

i am think of "up grading".........

thanx!!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Ok.. How did ya get that upside down question mark thingie ???