View Single Post
  #4  
Old July 7th 08, 10:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Paul Hastings
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Best homebuilt for ~700 nm commute


"Jay Maynard" wrote in message
...
On 2008-07-07, wrote:
Re the Tango (composite) and RV (metal) an article in July Sport
Aviation (pg 54) addresses Drag Coefficient as a function of
construction process. The multiplier for the Drag Coefficient for
composite is 1.0-1.05 and for flush rivet metal is 1.10. Composite
can reduce drag then by 5 - 10% over a metal constructed aircraft.
Food for thought.


The flip side: what happens when it collects hangar rash? Repairing aluminum
is well known; repairing composites is not.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC
http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (got it!)


Could you clarify that Jay?

The way I read it your saying that composite repair is not possible or much
harder than aluminum repair.

There are well established methods for repairing composite damage, without any
annoying rivet bucking noise.

Paul