View Single Post
  #4  
Old July 2nd 06, 09:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
Guy Alcala
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default Explain the Navy-Marine Corps Tactical Air Integration Plan tome.

Henry J Cobb wrote:

Diamond Jim wrote:
"Henry J Cobb" wrote in message
...

A: The Navy intends to reduce it's purchase of F-35Cs by deploying more
Marine Corps strike fighter squadrons on board big deck carriers.

B: The USMC plans to buy zero F-35Cs.

Does A + B mean that the next USN big deck carrier will have a ski ramp?


No why should they have ramps. They Navy doesn't have ramps on the Amphibs
when the Marines deploy the Harriers on them. The F-35B's deployed on the
carrier would most likely be used as air to ground attack aircraft with the
Navy F-35C's doing the air to air/ fleet protection mission. Besides they
may still put some kind of catapult launch system on the F-35B (bridle ?).


The Gators are mainly helicopter carriers with a reduced (i.e.
TAIP-sized, around 10 planes) Harrier squadron. They need flightdeck
space more than range.

Wouldn't a ramp cause problems for V-22 takeoffs?


Assuming a V-22 STO instead of a VTO it might, depending on where the V-22 began
its t/o run, the length of same,the ramp height/angle and the V-22's climb slope.
Of course, it's possible that the V-22 has enough proprotor clearance at 60 or 70
degrees that it could use a ski jump with no problem -- E-2s were successfully
tested off low-angle (2.1deg. IIRR) ski jumps. Whether the proprotors are
designed to take the rapidly changing vertical acceleration as they transit the
ramp, I couldn't say.

Guy