On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:27:11 GMT, "Bjørnar Bolsøy" wrote:

Alan Minyard wrote in
:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:17:22 GMT, "Bjørnar Bolsøy"
wrote:

Mark and Kim Smith wrote in
:

Well sure there were explosives. It's called jet fuel and
oxygen. These folks really need to learn how those building
were built before they start coming up with these dumb
theories.

Is it likely to assume that the fuel burned up in the explosion
when the airplane impacted?


Regards...



No, there would be a great deal of fuel remaining. Remember that
the "explosion" would rob itself of Oxygen.

Looking at the video of the south tower impact, doesn't the huge
fireball outside the building seem to suggest that much, if not
most, of the fuel burned up on the outside?



Regards...

No, the "huge fireball" would have consumed a large amount of
jet fuel, but not all of it. It is nearly impossible to get "complete"
combustion under those circumstances.

Al Minyard