nt (Gordon) wrote in message ...
Mike says:



you who has a
stainless credibility of high flying US NAVY aviation expert.

Thanks, comrade Mikey! Here I thought I was just a face in the crowd of
people
who think of you as a nationalist ex-patriot.

Wrongly thought. In fact I am internationalist and patriot, Russia
patriot of course.

An external patriot then?

internal, Gordon internal since 2000.

I wonder how such a "patriot" helps his country from
a distance. In your case, it does make sense -- "Comrade Michael, you serve us
best by leaving."

Don't you think Gordon it is a bit stuipid to cry "get out" then nobody around?


Not a US patriot. That's the only reason for you pathological hate
against me.


No, no - just a few annoying traits of yours. Like other nationalistic
chest-beaters, when you spend 100% of your efforts driving down the country you
oppose, it makes you look shrill.

I remember one time you said I am brilliant... I know it was
yet an other "small mistake" but still very sincerely. However
you did not apologize for that one till now.



Although
the question remains do all US NAVY aviation experts still believe that
Tu-160s and russian NAVY Tu-22M3s are the same planes? Just curiosity.

Ask them, comrade - since I have been out of the Navy for years, it seems
ridiculous of you, as usual, to think I am speaking on their behalf. I
don't
represent the US Navy; I represent the people who think you are a fool.

Are you an impostor in addition?

LOL No, Mikey, I really DO represent the people who think you are a fool.

Gordon, you DO represent fools in this NG who totaly incapable to keep
their own views without hate the opposite ones of others.


Why would not you speak for yourself
only?

Who else would I speak for, Comrade? My kids, perhaps. That's about it.

What?


But you want bring others who gave you no rights for "speaking on
their behalf".

Well, its supposed to be a big secret, but I'm sure we can trust you. You
see, Michael, there are about 50 of us that meet twice a month in Francoise'
cellar where we plot ways of making you look dense. By popular vote among the
Moonboy Fanclub, I am their spokesman.

Is it a kind of humor attempt? Increadible even that this kind
style still can survive somewhere in a dark corner.


Why is that? Just make your empty words looking a bit more heavier.
That's why. A small useful lie, Gordon, again.

If you can't tell sarcasm, there isn't anything I can do to help you. "I
represent the people who think you are an idiot" is not a lie.

Well You believe I am idiot I believe you are idiot. Since in this game
there will be always draw game, how about switching on something else,
for instance similarities in NATO names for Tu-160 and Tu-22M. Ready?




Look at the dates. your "days" are from the same department of "small
mistakes". It seems Gordon you do have propesities to distort
unpleasant
reality according to your current needs. Yeah Gordon small useful lie?

Funny, that - I made a mistake and didn't try to cover it.

I never said you tried to cover it. It was simply impossible.
Otherwise
I think you almost certainly would try.

You _think_?

You knows it better than I do.


In the last couple
years of watching you here in RAM, I don't recall ever seeing you do the
same.

Perhaps s bad vision.

Riiiiiiiiiight, Moonboy.



As for Tu-22M3 vs. Tu-160 well some "small mistakes" can destroy
professional reputation forever.

Thankfully, I am not a professional in aviation at this point in my life. Just
a person who made a small mistake and admitted to it. Sorry, Moonboy, but if I
had a professional reputation to damage, I think claiming Apollo was a hoax
would be the proper way to "destroy" it.

Well claiming only would mean that. But collecting scientific
papers, looking into details, learning space physics and based
on it drawing your own conclusions on that purely scientific
matters would mean totaly different. For intance you could try
to estimate radiation dozage based on published data for crossing
van-allen belts and compate it with an official NASA data. Although...
you are not only aviation expert also you are not a researcher...
One day you said you are news (TV I guess) eater, or something like
that. Than my appology your life horizonts are indeed too narrow
to think about such things like could manned moon landing be for real
or not.



I didn't confuse these two numerical designations, I confused their quite
similar NATO reporting names,

Are "Blackjack" and "Backfire" names so really similar for you?

Simple mistake, comrade. Like when you call yourself a patriot, when you live
and work in a different country, contributing nothing to your country.

And where this false conclusions were derived from. Morerover unlike
your contributions my dear, my contributions is very easy to find out.
Go to a library and ask for "Petukhov M" in a pubmed search engine.


ONCE, in a posting, and admitting to my mistake.
Since you seem in a position of being able to claim you've never made a
similar
mistake, I'd love to see you say that in print.

Although I am not an aviation expert I indeed never confused Tu-160
and Tu22Ms.

I did. Once.

And rightly! But russians say "there is no bad without good"
next time you will think twice before open your mouth.


in my personal view this
"small mistake" does speak for the real professional level of
its maker.

Wow, that stings.

Your "personal view" is mighty narrow anyway and is of no concern.

Lie again Gordon, You are very concern about my "personal view".

LOL No, I am very concerned about my kids. Little else.

What's wrong with your kids, Gordon? Perhaps wrong country?


Otherwise you would not respond in the way you did. Your reputation
is in danger.

Well... so far, you seem the only person to have taken notice that 1) I HAD a
reputation or 2) that I am in danger of destroying it.

What? The only one? yeah Gordon I did not know that. Terrible. I can imagine...


That's why you so concern. Note every time you try
to fix it you go in even more traubles. So recommend you: shut up.

Michael, I have thought over your suggestion and have decided that it is more
enjoyable to get into trauble.

what you mean under "I have thought"? Planning another trap, Gordon
for such a good innocent guy like I am is not what I would recomended
you. Think more about your poor life, its sense which was totally lost
and so on.

Michael