View Single Post
  #2  
Old October 31st 05, 02:43 AM
Bob Kuykendall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Harmon Rocket II questions

Earlier, Jason Grass wrote:

...Also, in looking at pictures of it,
pilots seem to have their heads right
up against the top of the canopy...


It's pretty typical when flying under a bubble canopy to add seat
padding until your head is right at the canopy crown, or at least as
close as comfortable. Glider pilots do that all the time to improve
visibility over the nose and downwards over the cockpit rail.
Taildragger pilots tend to do that to improve visibility during takeoff
and landing.

...Then it says he sand bagged the wing
to 6 G's. 6 G's isn't all that much for
an ultimate load test...


As much as I'm not a particular fan of the Harmon airplanes, I can't
say I'd do much different. I think that a good static test to a
_design_ limit of 6g should give you enough deflection data to
extrapolate the stresses above that to a reasonable degree of
confidence, and should leave you a flyable aircraft besides. I don't
think I'd do a static test to ultimate limit unless I was doing
something unorthodox or was expecting to manufacture finished aircraft.

Thanks, and best regards to all

Bob K.
http://www.hpaircraft.com/hp-24