"Denyav" wrote in message
...
What HM gov't would do if they received a specific terror warning for
London?
1)Issue a terror alert for London
2)Issue terror alerts for Montevideo,Montreal,Athens and Cairo,but not
for
London.

Which one would be the correct response?


None of the above, they would issue the orders
necessary to counter the threat, as has been done many times

Nice way of dodging some questions.


Nope its an accurate answer

A view that was overturned by every subsequent inquiry and
was self serving, their major interest was proving that it
wasnt the fault of the USN.


Only twice Kimmel and/or his kin were given opportunity to present their
their
case and evidences,in Naval court of Inquiry and in 90s during
Congressional
mini probe,and both panels,what a surprise,concluded that Kimmel should be
exonarated.


Horsefeathers, there were MANY inquiries and Kimmel testified during many
of them and the 1946 congressional inquiry contains the following paragraph

"All parties in interest have attested to the fact that they have been
afforded a full, fair, and impartial public hearing before the
committee. All witnesses who retained counsel-Admiral Stark, Admiral
Kimmel, and General Short-were given the opportunity to be examined by
their counsel if they so desired, and to submit questions to committee
counsel to be asked other witnesses."



Irrelevant

This word seems to be the most frequenly used word by the custodians of
Pearl
Harbor conspiracy when they face hard evidence.


Which is inevitable when irrelevant issues are raised.

BRITISH Government was unwilling to
declassify
material relevant to the Pearl Harbor intelligence issue because it was
subject to the
UK-USA Intelligence Agreement, they made no complaint about US files
being withheld

I was referring to Crane files not British files.Sen.Thurman and
Rep.Sprnce
were denied access to these files in 90s.

And yet Stinnet claims that they are in the bnational archive
http://www.independent.org/tii/news/021202Stinnett.html


In other words Mr.Willshaw,representatives of American people
investigating
Pearl Harbor incident were denied access to almost 60 year old files.


They stated not

Trouble is the 12 subsequent inquiries, including the extremely through
1946 congressional investigation ALL overthrew that result.

Kimmel just made too many mistakes.

Actualy Army Board of investigation report was much more damaging for
FDR-Stimson-Marshall trio than Navy version.

Hardly

Marshall offered his resignation after Army report.

Arndt started this thread and made a capital mistake by implying that UK
has
become a banana republic of US.
US was a banana republic for UK in 1941 also US was a UKs banana republic
in
2001.


No bananas here bwana, note the last thing Britain wanted in
1941 was war with Japan, it diverted massive resources
away from the war in Europe at a time when the Nazis
were only 150 miles away from London and the U-Boats
were sinling our merchant marine at an unsustainable rate.

Lord Rhodas' ideas sometimes realized by using Rhodas scholars. sometimes
by
using shock and awe methods.


That's Rhodes old boy, do try and get the name right
and he used cold hard cash to achieve his ends,
war wasnt profitable.

Heck,everbody is trying to find a Straussian (Neocon),Jewish,Israeli or
Southern Baptist connection in 21st century version of PH,but nobody is
looking for an Anglo connection.

As I said before,I admire British great gaming skills.



There arent too many southern baptists in London old son.

Keith