View Single Post
  #21  
Old August 20th 04, 06:20 AM
Venik
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ed Majden wrote:

Weren't these aircraft designed for different purposes in mind so direct
comparisons are meaningless. The SR-71 is a high altitude recon. platform
as wasn't the Mig 25 a high speed interceptor which needed high speed dash
capability and not long endurance?

Ed


Not quite. The Ye-155 (MiG-25's development designation) was from the
very start produced in two versions: Ye-155P ("P" is for Perekhvatchik -
interceptor) and the Ye-155R ("Razvedyvatel'niy", or Reconnaissance).
The PVO needed and interceptor and the VVS needed a high-speed
high-altitude recon plane. It was decided to combine the two
requirements in a single design. I see nothing wrong in comparing MiG-25
to SR-71 because both were recon planes and one of them was also the
primary target for the other.

--
Regards,

Venik

Visit my site: http://www.aeronautics.ru
If you need to e-mail me, please use the following subject line:
?Subject="Newsgr0ups resp0nse"