On May 14, 2:05*am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
Hi herb.

On May 14, 12:06 am, Herbert Viola wrote:

In article
,
*Douglas Eagleson wrote:

It is disgusting because the refer to the Wright Flyer as analysis of
behavior of all canards.

I was wondering where all my stupid pills went.

I agree. The canard is vastly superior and yes the US
aerodynamic intel is retarded.
For example, using negative lift on the tail is less
effective than using positive canard lift, but the dumb
yanks won't learn that until they get a good thrashing!
The F-22 is vulnerable, I could design a machine that
would blow that machine out the sky *PRONTO.
Ken

Simple slang to confuse was the issue.

I use slang to demand a correct behavior in true thought.

I can read predicate. And to disagree was all the predicate says. So
Tucker writes in slang "two form" to simply evade the issue I proposed
once more.

A slight of hand only. Everybody just wants to evade the point and
flame. A poor behavior.