"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

If you say so. In any case, I'm satisfied that the words he used
meant
exactly that, and I expect that most of the English speaking world
feels the
same way about it.

You must have an awful inferiority complex to get satisfaction out of
twisting the words of others. I've noticed that I'm not the only one
you
favor in that manner since you seem to use that ploy with just about
anybody
who foolishly exchanges words with you. It hardly generates friendly
feelings or even feelings of civility to be constantly and persistently
pushed by you to explain the meanings of commonly accepted words and/or
phrases or to have you redefine their meanings into something that
wasn't
intended, but if that's how you get your jollies, I don't expect that
bringing it to your attention will result in any behavioral changes on
your
part. But I felt that I had to try even if it ends up only being
something
akin to ****ing into the wind.


Nobody twisted your words, you twisted George Bush's words.

Poor Georgie! Can you imagine anyone ever accusing him of misspeaking?
Of
course not! And you're just like him.....you never twist anyone's words.
Of
course not....it's never you, it's always me. I'll let you in on a
secret: I
do it deliberately just to **** you off.

You lie deliberately to **** him off? Your stature, already plummeting after
your "you made an acknowledged typo and I'm gonna hold you to it anyway"
crap, continues to seek new lows, Georgie. You need to unblock
Tarver--sounds like you and he are a match for each other.


Mea culpa! Mea culpa! Mea maxima culpa! Beat me to death with a wet
noodle.
Feel better, now? (^-^)))

You have already admitted you are a liar--why should we take *anything* you
have to say as being truthful?

Brooks