"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net...

"Leadfoot" wrote in message
news:vrs4d.333334$Oi.275509@fed1read04...

Actually, Bush has shown that he is qualified. Kerry is an unknown
to some degree. As a Senator he opposed adequately defending
the US.


Find me a vote where it was his vote that was critical.


Irrelevant.

In other words you can't do it.




Such as?


Invading Iraq not only needlessly but diverting assets away from are
real
enemy al-queda.


There was no needless invasion of Iraq, the war on terror was never
limited
to al Queda.

No wmd and no constructive links to al-queda. For that matter they can't
even show any terror attack was planned by Iraq agasinst the US.





Not being prepared for the occupation of Iraq.


Not everything in war goes according to plan.

Lame excuse


They've wanted this war since 1998, they've had contol since 2001, they
didn't plan ahead




These guys have been planning this since 1998.


Bush has been president since only 2001.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm

Notice the names at the bottom.





On defense matters the Bush team has done an excellent job.


Invading Afghanistan was done very well. The iraq diversion was were
he fell apart.


Iraq was not a diversion and nothing has fallen apart.

What about the NIE that bush dissed that predict civil war?