View Single Post
  #4  
Old July 29th 08, 05:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Copperhead144
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Double Eagle + orphaned engine = a winner?

On Jul 29, 1:05*am, Anthony W wrote:
After Bob Hoover's recommendation of the double eagle, I fond myself at
the DE website and thinking I've found my first (maybe only) plane.

I already have a stock 1600cc bug engine to use that is ready to put
together other than a few bits but I'd like to try Bob's suggestions and
go with the 78mm crank. *Anybody have a good recommendation on a 78mm crank?

I will be turning the engine around and mounting the prop on the big
bearing end of the engine but I'm not sure how I'm going to do that
right now. *The Great Planes rear drive looks overly complicated but the
only other system I've seen was on a German website a couple years ago
on a type 4.

I have an 1800cc engine sitting in a friend's basement (assuming he
hasn't tossed it) but I'm not sure if the increase power will balance
out the added weight. *Then there's the high price of the 1800cc parts....

Suggestions, comments, slurs? *Let me know what you think...

Tony


Oddly I'd never considered the Double Eagle even after reading about
it, I'd become more fixiated on the Legal Eagle or Texas Parasol
concept, but both of those would end up as LSA in the end for my use
and not UL. This now make's the DE look even nicer, more of that
stepping outside of the box aspect of project development. Thank's
folk's I'll be pondering this a bit.

Joe