View Single Post
  #41  
Old March 7th 08, 11:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.piloting
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven


"Ron Lee" wrote in message ...
wrote:
All that said, the most common
argument (not necessarily one with which I'm in agreement) in favor of
professional builds of experimental aircraft is that the pro shops
turn out a better quality product which is less likely to injure or kill
the proverbial innocent bystander. Even if we accept that at face value
(which I certainly don't), it begs for the creation of a new
experimental sub-category, perhaps Experimental Professional Built,
with increased oversight akin to that suffered by the standard category
manufacturers in pursuing and maintaining their type certificates.


I also don't agree that innocents are less likely to be killed by a
pro built plane. Show me the stats to prove it.

The real killer is that the customer of a pro built plane may also get
the repairman's certificate which means that he lied about building
it.

Ron Lee



It would be very interesting for someone to be charged with operating an illegally built aircraft. How would this be
challenged in the courts?