Thread: Anti Aviation
View Single Post
  #5  
Old August 15th 03, 04:56 AM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If I were a lawyer, I'd do my home work and any deaths of people
landing at remote site would be cause for a suit against the
committee. After they forked over a few million dollars they might be
of a different mind.

Big John


On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 03:00:42 GMT, Larry Fransson
wrote:

In article ,
"hillbilly_hippo" wrote:

I simply cannot believe that there is a person that posts there that is
advocating banning medi-vac helicopters simply because the NOISE disturbs
him!


Believe it. It's true.

Children's Hospital in Seattle has a helipad, but it doesn't get used
much. Only truly "emergent" flights can use it. The rest have to fly
to a helipad at the north end of the University of Washington athletic
fields and go the rest of the way (a couple of miles) by ambulance.
There is a committee of local homeowners around the hospital that review
the records from flights that use the hospital's helipad in order to
determine if it was truly emergent and justified.