View Single Post
  #14  
Old May 24th 05, 04:31 AM
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message


Without a sectional of that end of the country, I have difficulty
appreciating the diversion. Could you describe it?


DC area including ADIZ and P-40:
http://www.aopa.org/images/whatsnew/.../03-1-063x.jpg

Flight path:
http://tinyurl.com/8ow44

They weren't trying to avoid P-40 (Camp David airspace NW of Washington).
They were on a direct path to Lumberton, NC.

Without more information, it's difficult to assign blame for the
inability to communicate. Certainly, your hypothesis is one possible
explanation, but I could think of others...


Larry, this is the worst baiting attempt I've seen from you. What frequency
do you think they requested first? Even if it wasn't a "standard"
frequency, what frequency *should* the pilot have tuned during an intercept
procedure? If *ALL* else fails, what frequency would you attempt to use?

As with your earlier analogy, the Florida MAC had *nothing* in common with
this issue.

Of course, that's not true. If the C-150 had gotten closer to the
White House, it would have been downed.


Perhaps. The point remains the intercept pilots did not request nor were
granted permission (authority) to open fire at any point in this scenario.
Therefore, nobody had authority to shoot down the plane.

Please cite the source of your assertion. Or is it just your guess?


Several news stories reported what I said. Show me otherwise.

Define "worked". The inability to establish communications certainly
confirms that the system almost resulted in the death of two airmen.


No, it didn't. Their negligence almost killed them.

Again, this should not in any way be construed as any kind of support for
the ADIZ, but I certainly wouldn't go flying around Nevada without knowing
*exactly* where I should *not* be. Likewise, if you're not familiar with
the DC area and the ADIZ procedures, do yourself (and the rest of us) a
favor and stay well clear.

(unfortunately, since this will probably bolster
various alphabet soup agencies around DC).


What is that supposed to mean?


It plays into the hands of various security agencies that want a much more
restrictive airspace around DC.

You have provided no evidence that the C-150 pilots were at fault for
the initial lack of communication. It's pretty clear the PIC was
negligent, but he deserves to be heard before conclusions are drawn.


Oh, please. Read their own statement:
"...our radio had been working during the flight, which we know, because we
were able to monitor other aircraft communications... [After turning
westbound] we were then able to establish two-way radio communication on the
original emergency frequency..."

Their radio suddenly worked after they turned 90 degrees and visually
verified they'd screwed the royal pooch. I'm not buying the idea that they
could not raise ANYbody on 121.5. Not in this area. Even *IF* the
Blackhawk crew had accidentally turned off that frequency, I guarantee
either the Citation, the F-16s, Potomac TRACON or one of the many aircraft
in the area listening to guard on COM2 would have heard and responded.

I doubt you're naive enough to honestly think *all* of the intercept aircrew
and everybody else in the area were not listening to 121.5.

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________