In rec.aviation.piloting columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
On Aug 11, 1:33 pm, wrote:" Utter nonsense.
Poll place officials have to go through some minimum vetting….
Everything is subject to tampering and that is an entirely separate
issue."

On Aug 11, 6:19 pm, wrote:" Yeah, and again,
attempting to copy the additional information to the existing
information would be instantly noticed by one of the anal little old
ladies that tend to make up the bulk of the personnel at a polling
place as "funny business" going on."

On Aug 11, 7:50 pm, wrote:" The people that
run the polling places take the whole thing very seriously and don't
take well to people doing other than what is expected so this isn't
going to happen in the real world."

On Aug 12, 10:16 am, wrote:" In addition,
there are monitors in the room to ensure everyone is doing what they
are supposed to be doing."

On Aug 12, 3:11 pm, wrote:" Well, whoop-de-
do, scatter brain. Lots of people are capable of malice but that is
NOT the issue. The issue is whether or not it would be possible to
perform mass identity theft at a polling place. All your links have
shown is how easy it is to get caught doing any sort of mischief
related to voting."


Yep, and just about everything above is validated by your link below.

http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/...ts-2333835.php


You incorrectly tried to isolate the argument,

Nope, I focused on the crux of your whinning, i.e. showing ID at a polling
place will lead to mass identity theft.

which contradicts your
blanket statement “Everything is subject to tampering”. Then you
ignorantly tried to argue the vetting was full proof and produces a
secure environment,

Incoherent.

which was proven false by my links,

Nope, if anything your single link related to polling places just goes
to show how unlikely it is that anyone could get away with mass identity
theft at a polling place.

Your other link had nothting to do with the subjct of identity theft at
a polling place.

and
contradicted by your blanket statement.

Inchoherent.

Then you argued that because
poll workers "take the whole thing very seriously", a secure
environment would be produced which has been proven false by my links

Nope, one of your links had nothing to do with polling places and the
other just showed how easy it is to get caught doing mischief at a polling
place.

showing a breach of a secure environment, therefore based on your
logic some dont take the "whole thing seriously".

Illogical as both links showed how easy it is to get caught tampering
with the voting system.

Remaining rambling, run on sentences and sentence fragments snipped.

Do you have any clue how to compose a paragraph?