On Aug 12, 5:29*pm, wrote:


In rec.aviation.piloting columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
On Aug 11, 1:33 pm, wrote:" Utter nonsense.
Poll place officials have to go through some minimum vetting….
Everything is subject to tampering and that is an entirely separate
issue."
On Aug 11, 6:19 pm, wrote:" Yeah, and again,
attempting to copy the additional information to the existing
information would be instantly noticed by one of the anal little old
ladies that tend to make up the bulk of the personnel at a polling
place as "funny business" going on."
On Aug 11, 7:50 pm, wrote:" The people that
run the polling places take the whole thing very seriously and don't
take well to people doing other than what is expected so this isn't
going to happen in the real world."
On Aug 12, 10:16 am, wrote:" In addition,
there are monitors in the room to ensure everyone is doing what they
are supposed to be doing."
On Aug 12, 3:11 pm, wrote:" Well, whoop-de-
do, scatter brain. Lots of people are capable of malice but that is
NOT the issue. The issue is whether or not it would be possible to
perform mass identity theft at a polling place. *All your links have
shown is how easy it is to get caught doing any sort of mischief
related to voting."
snip
http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/...tenced-for-ste...
You incorrectly tried to isolate the argument,
snip
which contradicts your
blanket statement “Everything is subject to tampering”. *Then you
ignorantly tried to argue the vetting was full proof and produces a
secure environment,
snip
which was proven false by my links,
snip
and
contradicted by your blanket statement.
snip
Then you argued that because
poll workers "take the whole thing very seriously", a secure
environment would be produced which has been proven false by my links
snip
showing a breach of a secure environment, therefore based on your
logic some dont take the "whole thing seriously".
snip


bs non-relevant digressions snipped, and please use well reasoned
logic, as you have yet to display you have a real rebuttal to my
factually correct argument. Try again, this time instead of skipping
over the fact i crushed your weak replies one by one, you might want
to just admit all you have left is your typical ad hominem bs.