Paul, Cambridge is doing very well ? Well, and tomorrow morning we meet
fo brunch at 10am on Mars, right ?
I can tell a 302 from a GPSNAV 20. Being the unlucky owner of a 302 for
a full year. Compared to LNAV's (yep, I've been a big Cambridge fan
until the late LNAV's) the 302 sucks. And along have been many SW
problems. That instrumnet is still not finished. Cambridge is well aware
of the problem of invalid reported broken seals. Not going into
functions of the 302 here....

Ernie

Paul Remde wrote:

Hi,

Cambridge is doing very well. I've sold many, many of the their instruments
this year and have found the products and technical support to be excellent.

I'm not aware of a problem with 302 flight logs. Please clarify. Are you
sure you're not confusing the issues with GPS-NAV IGC files. Apparently,
the IGC files generated from the secure .CAI files can't be used for the
Online Contest, but I think there are utilities to address that issue
available from the OLC web site.

Good Soaring,

Paul Remde
http://www.cumulus-soaring.com

"Ernie" wrote in message
news7Eqc.21607$0e6.17887@clgrps13...

Is Cambridge still around ? Does anybody know about the status with the
302 problem with validating IGC files and invalid reported broken
security seals ?

Ernie

Guy Byars wrote:

I have put the source code for the Cambridge Aero Explorer on my source

code

download page so those who are interested can download and play with it.

It

is now an opensource project. The opensource name is simply "Aero

Explorer"

as Cambridge is no longer involved with the project.

http://www.betsybyars.com/guy/winscore/sourcecode.html


Guy Byars