I was being civil, I even said thank you!

And your info is correct in your posting. Thanks for adding to the
thread.

Next time I'll try to be a little more tactful and politically correct
for those with thin skins and newservers with less than 3 days
retention.

I posted 5 times now to this thread in the last 3 days. They show up
on my newserver.

And no, being taught to be civil has never been part of the CWO
training track.

So how about a big hug and lets kill this thread?



On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 09:18:12 -0700, wrote:

I don't really know what you're raving about. So you're a WO. Don't
they teach you guys to be civil any more. FYI This message is the only
one from you in this news group. Or at least on mine.

Walt

On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:39:47 -0800, fudog50
wrote:

On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:07:32 -0800, "John Weiss"
jrweiss98155nospamatnospamcomcastdotnospamnet wrote:

wrote...
Interesting! For you not so old salts the Navy Warrant Officers were
supposed to be replaced by Senior and Master Chiefs in the early 60s.
For some reason it never happened. And correct me if I'm wrong, it's
been a long time, weren't WO2s and 3s non-commissioned?

I suppose it's another of those "great Quaker Life debates" that will change
every generation or 2, but not as often as the uniform... ;-)

CWO2 - CWO5 have been Commissioned ranks as long as I've known (CWO5 more
recently, of course).



Fer cryin out loud!

Just like sitting at a dept head meeting!!!

Just like the dept heads don't listen or comprehend then ask the same
questions already answered,,,, y'all don't read or comprehend very
well.

I refuse to repost what I already posted, but every single comment
after that was already answered in my posts.

Again, I AM A CWO, AND I AM COMMISSIONED SINCE DAY ONE!!!

Please go back and read what I typed for the love of god!!!!

Thank you!!!