From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 9/9/2004 2:09 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Subject: Last night on 60 minutes: Bush used influence to avoid Nam
From: "ian maclure"
Date: 9/9/2004 11:55 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 13:58:10 +0000, ArtKramr wrote:

It's all out now. Bush used influence to avoid combat.Well no one says a
president needs courage. (sigh)

Klintoon established that principle with crystal
clarity so its not like the Dhimmicraps can whine
about it legitimately.

IBM


Clinton is a heroic veteran of the Neocon wars with Congress. And while they
impeached, his strength and character defeated any attempts to remove him
from
office making him the clear winner in that war. He crushed the neocons into
the
dust as they gave up any attempt to remove him. Now that is what I call a
victorious combat veteran.


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:

Mein Gott, art, your definition of combat is amazingly flexible. On one hand
you claim your combat experience is more important than any one else's, on
another hand you say anyone who didn't see combat, whether there was a war at
the time or not, is a coward, on the third hand you say men who have not seen
combat are not entitled to political opinions, on the fourth hand you have said
FDR was a combat vet combat now you say clinton is a "victorious combat
veteran?" How many hands do you have?

Why do you refuse to define "neocon?"

Why do you demean yourself by resorting to childish name calling?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired