"Mark Leuck" a écrit dans le message de news:
...

"petem" wrote in message
. ..

well look like the lack of wmd in irak proove that the resolution that
the
UN passed was enforced...

No proof of that at all


Well dont you think that if there would have been some WMD somewhere in Irak
it would have been found?
are you telling me that they disolved in thin air while the attack?

And who was working for the oil-rich countries before becoming the
president?

If you mean Bush I believe he was working for the Texas Rangers before
becoming govenor although you are free to bring up the usual conspiracy
theories

no he had about 40% ownership in the texas ranger...he was not working for
them....are you telling me that someone like him would only have 1
occupation in life?

And who is still friend with them?
And can you give me a link to a web syte..(a reputed one...not any blog
or
supposely news site)that support the story about UN taking Bribes from
those
country

You want evidence UN individuals took bribes from Iraq? You can't be
serious

France was the FIRST country to help the USA in its strugle to be
free...

That was over 200 years ago when France actually had some guts


They still have guts but they do have wisdom too..wich other are
lacking...

France is one of the biggest offender in much of this, because of it's
stagnant economy they are constantly selling components commonly used in
weapons (conventional, nuclear and biological) to whoever will pay the
bill,
same with Germany and Russia


and the USA dont sell weapon? never sold any weapon to saddam?
never helped osama with its war against russia? remeber the what reagan had
to deal with some rebelious poeple ..the contra(ore something like that?)

The fact is France, Germany and Russia were against the war for one
reason,
Iraq was a customer

of them AND a costumer of the USA


France and Canada where against the war because their governments have
no
backbone and choose to look a blind eye to the worlds problems

A blind eyes...lets talk about behing blind....what do you do about the
spreading of nuclear weapon in asia?

Good question, if we invade them would you whine and cry about it like you
do with Iraq? North Korea has nukes because Clinton and the UN were
spineless to actually do something about it, same thing is happening right
now with Iran. Rules are worthless without enforcement which is why you
will
always see nothing but resolutions and sanctions from the UN, they've
never
had the guts for military action and ALWAYS have to be dragged into
enforcement by the United States

Now invasion again..there are MANY ways to deal with an other country then
to invade it..
big biceps no brain...

Gee I think thats the general purpose of death row isn't it?


Killing someone as a punishment for crimes is as intelligent as beating a
few month old baby cause he cries..

Now thats a brilliant analogy, a baby doesn't know any better while a
serial
killer tends to understand what he does wrong

The point is that in both situation its a useless use of force...

what would you fear more...the rest of your life with no way of gaining
freedom,behing bars 24/24 or behing killed after a few years by a shot?
i was go insane pretty fast being behind bars for a long period..

if i kill someone and have to think about it in a cell for the rest of my
life or being killed i would choose death...thats the easy way out..
so you are putting it easier for murderer..


now tell me does it help lowering the crime rate??

It prevents those individuals from doing it again, I'd say it reduces
crime
by 100%

but its still not lowering the crime rates..

UN is trying to prevent the USA to take us ALL in a stupid war..Too
bad
you
cant understand that..

No the UN is a gutless corrupt organization that does nothing in the
face
of
danger, too bad you can't understand THAT

Proove to me the corruption..

Umm didn't you watch the news last week?

I will show you 20 times more corruption in the white house....

Go for it

Mark i know that as an American this is sounding like i am against
American
poeple
wich is so far from the true...

I don't say that, I'd say you are much like many on the left who believe
loony conspiracy theories or have such a hatred for Bush that they blindly
believe many of the stories floating out there


you always talk about stories...dont you think that part of are true?

In fact i am very happy to have a super nation beside my nation...it
helped
me and my fellows go on with less worry..till Bush came to power....

Personally if I lived in Canada I'd love to have a neighbor actually doing
something instead of just talking about it, but thats just me

Attaking a country to fight terrorism will not help..its only creating
more
extremist that will attack the USA

Then explain the reasoning for 9/11, if you are correct then that should
never have happened right?

911 was because you let thing go out of countrol after putting your big nose
in someone else mess..


BTW: Doing nothing also tends to create extremists

No doing nothing after helping exetremist group getting organized is what
created Osama


American troops are not welcome in any part of Irak..

Give me proof of that, I can find countless stories claiming otherwise


i see a lot of bombing....


but you still think
that you delivered them from a Bad dictator..

Well I don't think we delivered them from a GOOD dictator

What they really see is that they used to have a dictator and a
country...now they have a country that dictate them and they lost there
country...

Yes thats why they were able to vote last week

wow!!! vote!! they are free!! come on..how could they vote freely when they
were afraid of being killed


thats not an improment...that dictator would have died anyway..and who
knows
what would have came after him..

Like North Korea usually the son/sons take his place, now that would have
been fun wouldn't it?

In haiti the son didnt last long and every thing feel down..

could have happen with some diplomacy work in the back...using brains...no
biceps..