"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:10:04 +0100, "John Mullen"
wrote:

"The Enlightenment" wrote in message
...

"Andrew" wrote in message
...
This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire.

The action of jubilantly standing on a destroyed Bradley to express
their
hate for the US occupation forces while the reactive and likely enraged
and
fearfull and possibly vengefull collegues of the Bradley crew may be
watching on is a dangerous act bordering on stupidity.

Your pro US opinion is pretty irrelevent. The US stupidly embroiled
itself
into a neocon agitated pro israel/zionist war that must inevitably fail
as
the Arab and Muslim world reject it. Now Americans must suffer the
consequences.

The US will continue to suffer casualities, growing finacial stress,
fear
and loss of freedoms, perhaps indefinetly, as it sinks in relation to
the
rising powers of the east and dilutes into an immigration driven ethnic
babel.

As those Reconquista inspired La Razza Mexicans can say with increasing
impuntiy to gringos: Hasta La Vista baby.



This
applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush to the scene to gloat.

He didn't seem to be gloating but was reporting from quite a distance
away
that looked like at least 25 meters.

Agreed. And deliberately targetting civilians is a new low. Each act like
this takes away another possibility that the US invasion force can ever
prevail. Why do they do it?


why do they take out those who support the opposition? Gee I don't
know, why do you think?

I think it is because they are stupid and naive. They didn't think through
the post war situation at all. Now the ordinary Iraqis and the troops on the
ground are paying the price.

Killing civilians indiscriminately because you don't like their 'attitude'
takes you to the level of the Nazis in Poland and Russia in WW2. Ask
yourself whether that works in the long term. What do you think?

John