View Single Post
  #8  
Old December 5th 03, 06:56 AM
Paul Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Indeed,

With all due respect....

"I don't have first hand experience..."

Please, Please do "correct" research on the IVO before you make
conclusions on rumours. For example N570 has over 570+ hours on a
220hp Franklin with IVO without problems and N6Q has 160+ hrs.
Obviously there are successfull high HP IVO uses. Again, its not the
horsepower, but the smoothness of the engine. See my other post above.

Please try normal objective language instead of using emotional,
prejudicial terms like "mickey mouse ... inspection" or "do ....
research on ALL THE PROBLEMS .... IVO Prop" - rather than of "do
research on problems AND successes of IVO". IVO is quite open and
honest to tell you that they will not sell their props for certain
engines.

osite (RobertR237) wrote in message ...
Please, please, please do a substantial amount of research on all the problems
associated with the IVO Prop before making a decision. I don't have first hand
experience but from what I have read and heard from some very knowledgable
sources in the industry it is a prop to be avoided, especially for the 200 -
220 hp engines. I am sorry but I have not kept any of the various reports and
data on the prop because I eliminated it from my list a long tim ago. One
thing to look at though is that micky-mouse foil tape inspection required for
that prop.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)