On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:27:41 GMT, "SeeAndAvoid"
wrote:
"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote
"N1234, expect visual runway 25, advise when you have atis Xray
and the airport in sight"
Why not just: "N5843Q, expect visual runway 32"?
It's shorter and conveys the same information and (implied) request.
It may be shorter, but we are required to know the other two items:
that you have the current weather (atis) and that you have the airport
in sight.
Oops, I overlooked the ATIS in your initial callup and I agree that if the
pilot does not report it, that you should request it. I was always taught
to advise the controller on my initial callup that I have the ATIS.
But, it is frequent for me to be asked if I have the ATIS even when I have
just called in reporting that I DO have the ATIS!
So far as the other, the pilot should know that he has to report the
airport (or preceding a/c) in sight in order to get the visual. So when
you say "expect", that primes me to report the airport in sight.
Most airports I do approaches to dont have an ATIS, so it's a moot point.
Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
|