Thread
:
Aircrew casualities
View Single Post
#
7
September 17th 03, 04:12 AM
[email protected]
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
(ArtKramr) wrote:
Bombardiers were actually among the best in survival rate if not the best (I
think
the navs were the best), because many of the attacks were from the rear, and
because they had an escape hatch in their compartment that was easy to get
to.
Guy
In the B-26 we had no escape hatch at all. The bombardier had along path to
creawl in front of the copilot then out the bombay. A long trip indeed. Maybe
we should break down the losses by aircraft type rather than lumping all
bombers together
Arthur Kramer
Lancasters were good to Bombardiers (and nose gunners), they had
their own good sized hatch in the bottom of the nose compartment,
matter of fact the Pilot and Engineer used that hatch too.
--
-Gord.
[email protected]