View Single Post
  #7  
Old June 13th 06, 12:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAA To Change Twin-Engine Airliner Regulations

Didn't realize the WSJ was such an authority on aviation... Like Brian
(FWT) said, the ETOPS certification benefits not just Boeing but Airbus
as well. The four engine A340 is losing out to the 777 in sales, and no
clever ad campaign (Four engines for the long haul) is going to reverse
declining sales due to fuel burn issues nowadays. The 777 and 787's
success has arguably been a factor in the redesign of the A350.

Larry Dighera wrote:
U.S. regulators are near to concluding that jetliners with two
engines are as safe as those with three or four engines and
should have the same flexibility in flying long-distance
routes, a report said. The Federal Aviation Administration is
nearing completion of rules that are expected particularly to
benefit BOEING CO.'s twin-engine 777 airliner, The Wall Street
Journal said. The rules also are expected to benefit Boeing's
strategy of building planes capable of flying passengers
directly to their destinations without transferring through
busy hub airports, the Journal said, citing industry officials.
Twin-engine planes currently have to stay within 3-1/2 hours of
an emergency landing strip while flying across wide expanses of
ocean or polar terrain, the newspaper said. Chet Ekstrand, a
senior Boeing safety official, said on Friday that he does not
expect the final regulations will have any changes of substance
from a draft the FAA released in November 2003. Officials from
the FAA and Boeing rival Airbus declined to comment. Airbus is
owned by EADS and BAE SYSTEMS PLC.
(Reuters 03:37 AM ET 06/05/2006)

Mo

http://q1.schwab.com/s/r?l=248&a=122...a&s=rb060 605

----------------------------------------------------------------