On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:18:10 GMT, (The Watcher)
wrote:

On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:24:24 +1300, "Nicholas Smid" wrote:

(snip)
Actually useing old people, with under post war conditions only a few more
years of life anyway, makes sound sence.

Not to me, it doesn't.

Given that they wouldn't be used in high contamination zones,

I wouldn't say that's a given. If they're gonna die anyway, why NOT use them in
high contamination zones?

Because that would be a waste of effort and resources and wouldn't get
you anything worth having.