Matt Barrow wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
In the instant
case, it is not feasible for private concerns to operate the
weather
bureau infrastructure, inclusing constellations of weather
satellites
and so on.
Oh, like the constellation of communications satellites?
And the broadcast groups?
How many of those were put into orbit by privately developed and
operated launch vehicles?
There is also a need for consistant (preferably high)
quality and availabllity from the standpoint of public saftey.
So you rely on government bureaucrats to provide that?
Yes and they do.
These are much the same people as run the Postal Disservice and
Amtrak.
Unhappy with the USPS are you? It has already been privatized.
IMHO, service was far more consistant and consistantly good
when there was a Postmaster General in the Cabinet.
Amtrak could not compete with the heavily subsidized airline
industry regardless of who managed it.
The proposal would not significantly reduce the government's costs,
but would significantly reduce the public benefit. Not good.
Yeah..corporations give us all our comforts and prosperity, but they
could
do that.
Get a clue!!
I'm not able to parse that, But riddle me this, is the market
for weather reporting more lucrative in heavily populated areas
or in sparsley populated areas? Which of those two are the
preferred areas for GA?
--
FF
|