Gord Beaman wrote:
"Keith W" wrote:

"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:

Don McIntyre wrote:
Why did they settle on the 3-blade configuration? Wouldn't a 4-bladed
system allow for a smaller footprint on the ground (or ship)? Or is
there too much thrust loss involved?

I would think folding 3 blades would be easier and lighter than
folding 4.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
?? Folding ??
--

-Gord.
(use gordon in email)
http://www.paravion.com/products/407...e_fold_kit.htm

Keith

Thanks Keith...I thought that Dan was referring to the V-22...I
don't think that it 'has' folding blades does it?...

Yep, it sure does. If you could ever describe an aircraft as folding up
like a pretzel, the V-22 is it:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...d-wing-seq.htm