View Single Post
  #13  
Old January 12th 04, 05:50 AM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "Bjørnar Bolsøy" am
Date: 1/11/2004 9:27 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

Alan Minyard wrote in
:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:17:22 GMT, "Bjørnar Bolsøy"
wrote:

Mark and Kim Smith wrote in
:

Well sure there were explosives. It's called jet fuel and
oxygen. These folks really need to learn how those building
were built before they start coming up with these dumb
theories.

Is it likely to assume that the fuel burned up in the explosion
when the airplane impacted?


Regards...



No, there would be a great deal of fuel remaining. Remember that
the "explosion" would rob itself of Oxygen.


Looking at the video of the south tower impact, doesn't the huge
fireball outside the building seem to suggest that much, if not
most, of the fuel burned up on the outside?



Regards...

That fireball was nothing compared to the fireball that would have been
generated if all the fuel burned at once.

Bear in mind the fuel inside burned for a long time.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired