Morgans wrote:

"a" wrote

In most cases, MX's remarks can be dismissed as irrelevant. From time
to time there's a meaningful contribution and sometines errors that
should be pointed out, but for the most part why dignify inane crap
with responses?

But his presence here is always disruptive.

Think of a marriage where one partner ****es off the other 90% of the time.
That partner also does not care if the other is ****ed off, at all.

Does the marriage have a chance of surviving? No way. The only way for it
to work is for one to leave, for good.

Same thing with MX being here. The only way the group will not continue to
suck eggs is for him to be ignored all of the time. It does not matter if
he is right 10% of the time. He is disruptive and needs to go.

Since there is nothing that forces anyone to read any article or thread
posted to USENET, I find the use of the word "disruptive" to be a bit
strange.

Any article, thread, or poster can be ignored.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.