sleepy6 wrote:
In article eQnde.3343$aB.2874@lakeread03, says...

sleepy6 wrote:


In article ,

t

says...


"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in mess

ag

e
...


Granted there is some bashing in some of the posts but the point of

the


posts
is to instruct not bash for bashing sake.

ROFLMAO! Instruct what, that guilt by association is the standard in

t

his
country? Perhaps in your native Poland, but certainly not here. Or m

ay

be
you're just trying to prove that being dense is an excuse to do anyt

hi

ng you
want on Usenet? Or maybe you're just banging your head against the w

al

l
because it feels good when you stop. Who knows.



Only thru the Internet and RAH in particular did those of us who we

r

e


zoomed
have a voice.

And then again only because not one of you have the gonads to do it

in

person. Hide behind the keyboard and throw rocks. Such a positive
mentality...

Juan



You must have conviently missed those pictures of Chuck confronting
Zoom and then Zoom being escorted out of Sun N Fun that recently wer

e

referenced on this list


Obviously you misunderstood what those pictures actually represent. It

seems there was an expected civil disturbance at the local Hardee's an
d
the police went to SnF to ask zoom's advice where upon he offered to g
o
take charge of the situation. The fact that no such disturbance ensued

is proof that, once again, zoom is an indespensible asset to the commu
nity.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired



That sounds like the version that would get reported in ANN


The truly frightening part is I learned how to write like that in the
Air Force.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired