"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
k.net...

"JD" wrote in message
news:vh9Tb.71816$U%5.393630@attbi_s03...

The media and most democrats charge President Bush lied to the American
people and led us into a war over oil. Even if you disregard GWB 1 and
the
war re Kuwait, in any attempt to be fair, you have to take these quotes
into
consideration:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998


An obvious lie, since no significant WMD have been found to date.


Really? How many people could be killed by 1 gallon of Anthrax spores?
How difficult would that be to hide? How many could have been killed by
the 7 pound block of cyanide found a few weeks ago? In powder form it
would have been EXTREMELY dangerous. How difficult would it be to
deliver either via zealout? Programs of a large scale have not been found,
and it appears that the nuke issue may not be a big deal. Although, the
yellow cake uranium that turned up in Europe from a iron salvage deal
is interesting. Officially, Iraq had none, so how did that turn up? My
point?
That is hasn't been proven yet doesn't make it untrue. The cyanide was
found,
and had the potential, if delivered as an aerosol to kill more people than
9/11,
so how do you define WMD?