In article , Denyav
writes
I don't know how many ways there are of conveying to you that I have no
idea what ZB said in this context. It's no use banging on about it
without telling me what you're talking about.

Then you must read Brzezinskis book titled "Grand Chessboard".

If you're so keen on spreading your message to the world, why don't you
tell us what he said?

Lots of babble but very little sense. If you live in an English-speaking
(and I bet that ****es you off) country, at least make an effort to use
the language comprehensibly. Your arguments, such as they are, are lost
in a non-grammatical morass of

Apparently you are experiencing difficulties in understanding of Rhodes' words
too.

I would understand what he said if you could quote it in a
comprehensible form.

BTW why a country with less than 20% Anglo population should be forced to nake
English the official language?


Might the fact that the USA has English as its official language just
have something to do with its history as an English colony?
Just imagine the history of the USA if the French or Spanish had been
the major power there. Or even the Germans.

Is the language alone not one of the main tools of Anglo Empire building
process?

The British Empire was acquired largely accidentally. The language does
tend to follow the colonisers/occupiers, not the other way around.


English ancestry, such as Washington? Is
a Scot like Polk classed as an Anglo? What about the Irish connection:
JFK and Reagan?

Answer the question (if you can)

Well,there were only two presidents that got the job without approval of Boston
Brahmins ,JFK and Nixon,the first one got killed after he killed Operation
Northwoods the latter one (politically) got killed after he killed
Bretton-Woods.period.

Not much of an answer. I still want to know what an "Anglo" is.

The president wanna be that Anglos hated most was Gore,closely followed by
Dean.

I've obviously missed out somewhere, because despite having links to
religious groups, the police, the armed services, charities, medical
services, broadcasting and business, and having family, friends and
business contacts in 11 or so countries, nobody has ever invited me e part of
the conspiracy. Not even the Freemasons or the Rotary Club.

Are you sure?

I think I would have noticed.

Perhaps that just proves your conspiracy theory: the absence of direct
proof or personal experience just shows how effective the conspiracy is!


Dont forget some people become the part of the even without realizing it,so
others for personal gains.

Then how do you know that you're not part of it as well?

Very clever of the "Anglos" to persuade all those Saudis to perpetrate
9/11. If the "Anglos" are that good, then they DESERVE to rule the world
(again).

Dont you know how Anglos play the "Great Game"?

The Great Game was specifically in 18th/19th century India. Stopping the
French, and even more so the Russians, from taking over there.

First game area selected then proxies not other way around.

So if the the game area selected populated predominanly by muslims then your
proxy must be an islamic terrorist organization.

If game area were Cuba then cuban terrorists would be the natural choice.

You do talk some crap.

So where is this game of yours leading? World domination by some
undefined group of goodness-knows-what? Once "they" have the world in
their grasp, what then? Brainwashing, Big Brother (Orwell, not Endemol)?

BTW no operative of any intel agency identifies him/herself to any terrorist
organization as such.
Saudis that piloted 9/11 planes probably did not even now for whom they were
working.

We stand where? Do you understand what "United we stand" means?
--

I think I know pretty well.
Do you know why these signs popped up everywhere in US after 9/11?

Well, what does it mean?

I have a good idea why the signs might have been there, but I didn't see
them.
--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!