View Single Post
  #5  
Old January 30th 04, 02:57 AM
Jay Somerset
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:49:38 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Ron Garrison" wrote in message
...

I had a 'first' last week, and I am looking for other peoples thoughts on
this one. It was my first (I believe) loggable instrument approach in what
was legally VMC. I was flying from the San Francisco bay area down to
Burbank. The reported conditions were sky clear, visibility 4 miles in

haze,
with the ILS 8 in use, no mention of visual approaches. The visibility

part
was right, from about 4,000 feet down to the surface there was about 4

miles
visibility based on when the runway appeared. I could see the ground below
just fine the whole time, but looking forward there was no visible

horizon.

I considered the approach loggable because:
1) navigation aids were required to find the airport
2) There was no visible horizon so the attitude indicator was required
to identify and maintain the desired aircraft attitude.

Any differing opinions on this one?


Could you have landed at that field without flying the approach? That's the
test I use.


An excellent, common-sense answer!!!