View Single Post
  #10  
Old June 28th 08, 12:32 PM posted to sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
dott.Piergiorgio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 56
Default Boeing Reveals Sub-Tracking ScanEagle Study

BlackBeard ha scritto:
On Jun 27, 7:42 pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote:

:It looks like the P-8 is going to use expendable UAV's to look
:at surface targets too:
:
:http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...plckController...
:
:Using expendable UAV's for routine missions like this could get
:expensive after awhile.
:

Apparently that costs less than the loss of airframe life from using
the airplane to do it, which is why it's being considered.

--
"Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute."
-- Charles Pinckney


I just spent 40 minutes responding to this post with an explanation of
what airborne ASW could do to really be part of the game and become a
serious threat to Submarines. It was really cool and relatively
inexpensive.
Then I realized what the hell I was doing and which side I favored so
I deleted the entire post.
I'm really glad I did, because while it would have been interesting to
see what some of you would have done with it, picking it apart and
playing with it, I know there are some very good S-T&E's here that
might have found a way to make it work. And that scared the hell out
of me.


How I must parse this ?

"I was writing ramblings on 'how things must be done' theme"

or

"I was on the verge of talking too much in a public place"

Best regards from Italy,
Dott. Piergiorgio.