View Single Post
  #206  
Old February 29th 04, 12:42 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Doug "Woody" and Erin Beal" wrote in message
...
On 2/28/04 1:54 PM, in article , "Kevin
Brooks" wrote:


"Doug "Woody" and Erin Beal" wrote in message

SNIP


snip


Logic fault. You are claiming that because it was allegedly not required

in
this instance, it will never be required. Kind of hard to support that

kind
of argument. Given a scenario like Afghanistan, where the CAS assets had

to
transit great distances to and from the required area of operations, the
ability to get STOVL assets into the A/O early in the campaign could be

a
big advantage, and reduces the load on the other assets (like those

F-15E's
and F-16's transiting out of the Gulf area). If it is unnecessary, why

is
the USAF now joining the STOVL bandwagon--merely to make nice with their
USMC brethren?


Precisely... With one important distinction they're more than likely

hoping
to take their USMC brethren's place and to keep unit costs down by

ensuring
that the STOVL version doesn't get axed.


That is so far out of reason it is unbelievable. Firstly, if the STOVL
version were axed, the USMC would just buy one of the other two
versions--they will have to replace those old F/A-18's and (by then) AV-8B's
with *something*, so there is no merit to this strange theory you have
postulated. Secondly, axing of the STOVL would be unlikely anyway, because
the RN/RAF have placed their bets on that version. Have you got any
*reasonable* reasons why the USAF would allegedly just toss away a few
billion bucks on STOVL aircraft it really does not want?


I doubt that. Is STVL the way to go for all TACAIR? Of course
not. But eliminating it just reduces your own versatility, and that

would
not be a wise move in the current environment of uncertainty (as regards
where/when/how we'll have to fight).

Brooks


What I'm claiming is that STOVL is still risky technology that kills too
many pilots in peace time and offers too little benefit in war time for

that
cost.


Any evidence that STOVL kills more pilots than other fast jets? Or any
evidence that the F-35B is inherently unsafe or "risky" technology? ISTR the
STOVL X-35 demonstrator did pretty well...

Brooks


--Woody