On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:12:40 -0400, Pete wrote:

Canada is good to us homebuilders. The only downside is the $0.70
Canadian dollar.

We have an 'advanced ultralight' regulatory category which is a real
loophole for heavy two-passenger 'ultralights' - which are actually
anything under 1200lbs. Licensing for these can be a Rec pilot permit or
Ultralight-instructor rating.

For a homebuilt 1200lbs our regs are simlar to the US, but without the
liability issues, one extra pre-closeout inspection and the Rec pilot
permit makes life easier to fly anywhere in Canada with 1 passenger,
non-complex, day VFR only.

Cheers,
Pete
Europa A239

"Ed Wischmeyer" wrote in message
...
I currently live in the Netherlands and I'm looking to relocate. I've
long wanted to learn to fly and build a light (experimental and/or
ultralight) airplane and I'm wondering which countries would be well
suited
for that, economically and with regards to permits/licenses.

The US seems to be in the lead, but the Australian regulations just
loosened up a whole lot. Don't know about the relative cost of living,
taxes, and all that, or where the kits, fuel, etc, are cheaper. US
insurance and liability are out of control, though. Maybe somebody else
knows.

Ed Wischmeyer

Back before the events of 11 Sept 01, I would have said Canada and the US
were pretty much a toss up in terms of freedom of flying. Each had their
advantadges and disadvantages. But now I think Canada comes out ahead. No
pop-up TFRs. No TFRs around nuclear reactors or sporting events. No
security Nazis at the TSA.

Also, there is a Notice of Proposed Amendment to the Canadian Aviation
Regulations that will officially legalize hiring out the building of a
homebuilt aircraft (if it ever gets approved). See:

http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/RegServ/Affairs/carac/NPAs/MM/Archives/jun01/2001050.htm

--
Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit)
Ottawa, Canada
http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/