"ian maclure" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 07:12:47 -0500, Bob Escher wrote:

No but according to today's news his commanders
did it all for him.
He didn't have to do a thing according to the reports

Not been paying close attention have we.
Said reports have been outed as forgeries.


http://littlegreenfootballs.com/webl...uments-_Forged
http://www.warbirdforum.com/bushf102.htm

Comes the day of reckoning on Nov 3 there's gonna be a few very
sorry Dhimmicrips.

You know, at first I thought the forgery bit was maybe just sourgrapes, but
after reading the alleged document, you gotta ask--who the heck really
thinks such a document would have ended up in Bush's own military records
anyway? Memos-for-record titled "CYA" do NOT end up in some guys 201 file.
Coupled with the interesting fact that the document CBS put out, which
supposedly dated from 1972 and would have at best been done up on an IBM
Selectric, matches *exactly* the same document ginned up using MS Word, the
forgery case does indeed seem realistic. Whatcha make a bet the big media
ignores this (having already trumpeted the documents), just like they are
trying to ignore Kerry's own contradictory Vietnam stories versus his own
journal entries from that time period?

Brooks


IBM