View Single Post
  #3  
Old May 2nd 04, 01:16 PM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article 3s_kc.9238$TD4.984687@attbi_s01, Brad Z
wrote:

Question for the gallery-
Refer to the FCI ILS 33 Approach
http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0405/06066I33.PDF
The published missed approach requires tracking to the flatrock VOR (FAK).
For the past few months, the following notam has been published: FAK VOR
067-230 UNUSBL. So basically, you'd need to track an unusable radial
inbound to FAK. There is no additional notam na'ing the approach, or
providing alternate missed approach instructions.
1) Am I correct to assume that it is not legal to accept a clearance to fly
this approach without alternate missed approach instructions?
2) Should a notam be issued to change the missed approach instructions, or
"na" the approach?


Sounds like a question for the montly Blue Sheet.
Have you filed an NASA 277 form with the ASRS?