-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mike Rapoport wrote:
I am not really concerned that "I" or "We" (pilots) might have to pay. It
is wrong after funding all the weather research, observing stations,
satellites ect with taxpayer money to not make the results of that
investment availible to the people who paid for it...Everybody

Mike
MU-2

I agree totally, don't get me wrong. It is quite wrong to make
us have to pay for something we are already paying for. It's definitely
time to get SIGs and the like involved (AOPA, possibly NATCA, etc.),
even amateur meteorologists. This is going to affect everyone, and the
more people say no, the more it's going to be shot down. But if it's
left quietly, and the money that AccuWeather feeds this guy under the
table, it's going to become reality. So we all need to start shouting.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.sbcglobal.net/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCafTJyBkZmuMZ8L8RAsdeAJ0ctvDP+q3yHSWqb9dHCl LprmW7wQCeO095
PKlaz7U7Ue5Nt8nELFQnsQo=
=Fq99
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----