OK, I ask you again, besides what you and the other Nazi teuton have said
about
this and other projects have you any verifiable proof from a source other
than
UFO sites? You keep telling us about "classified for 75 years" information
only
you and teuton know about and

Well,the term UFO has been invented in US AFTER the occupation of Germany alone
this fact should make you a little bit suspicious.

The term used by Kammlers SS advanced weapons research and development
directorate for such craft was SFOs (SonderFlugObjecten) not UFOs.

Regarding classification of documents by Anglos and the lies told by Anglos
there is a direct correlation as classification widely used to cover lies.
One of the best examples of this is the lies of Gen.Groves.
Gen.Groves attemped to explain sudden and unpredicted spike in US u-235
production in June 45 with improvements in uran production process.
Even during hey days of Groves, his explanation met with remarkable sceptism
from experts.
But nobody could prove that he was lying,because total and plantwise u-235
production figures were among Americas best kept secrets.
Now thanks to DOEs openness policy in 90s we all know that US production really
spiked in June 45 but none of US facilities was responsible for the spike.
Groves,knowing that the crucial information will remain classified during his
lifetime,did not bother to to tell lies to public.
Thats the way how world famous Anglo pragmatism works.



how the Nazis manage to detonate 2 atomic bombs
without anyone noticing or anyone involved writing about it. Any idea when
you
intend to provide verifiable proof?

Both test were witnessed by hundreds of people second test on March 4 even by
thousands of people,including almost whole populations of small towns near test
site and even by an USAAF aircrew.

Some of eyewitnesses have even appeared in TV programs in Germany and described
what they saw on March 4.
All eyewitnesses also said that the town people were interviewed by Americans
(and later by Soviets) about the events of March 4,but interestingly there is
no record of such interviews in declassified US archives.