"DC" wrote in message
. au...
Michael Kelly said the following on 10/06/2004 12:04 PM:

Doubt you'd only want a fleet of 4 of any aircraft. I've had the
experience of trying to support 3 customers with a squadron of only 6
Bones (6 + 1 in depot), and it wasn't pretty. This is at a base with
two other squadrons flying another 24 planes, 4 would be unworkable.
Furthermore, there aren't enough Bones left to lease four unless
congress backs off from bringing the 23 out of retirement (7 are gone
for good). Even at that not sure you'd want the ones at DM, pretty
picked over.

That said, it could be workable with a fleet size of 10 or 11 if the US
follows through with the plans to stand up a squadron in Guam. Although
that would depend on us only bringing back 11-12.

How would the B1B and B2 compare? Would a force consisting of F-22
fighters and B-1B or B-2 bombers be feasible for the RAAF (as
compared to the F-35) or would it be way too expensive?

Australia could not afford to own/operate B2 aircraft, perhaps a handful of
B1's if given a massive "friendly" discount . Even reaching for F-22's would
mean buying no more than a dozen or so before the budget ran dry.....

--
The Raven
http://www.80scartoons.co.uk/batfinkquote.mp3
** President of the ozemail.* and uunet.* NG's
** since August 15th 2000.